A common dynamic in relationships is that there’s one “more responsible” partner that’s first to notice things – whether it’s a stain on the carpet or that it’s time to renew the car registration. That partner is faced with two choices – they can deal with the issue themselves, or ask their partner to deal with it, stepping into the role of a domestic autocrat giving orders to their peons. Either way, resentment ensues on both sides. And predictably, when enough resentment builds, it can turn into bursts of rage or pervasive passive aggressiveness. ...

Consider these scenarios: Scenario 1: Your partner tells you that they you want to show you something in the garden, and you say that you’ll be there in five minutes. Five minutes later, you’re still finishing up that email… just a little while longer. 15 minutes later, you finally show up, with some excuses about the delay. Scenario 2: You’re supposed to walk the dog in the mornings, but the night before, your boss throws a work meeting on your calendar at the last minute. You ask your partner to cover for you – they acquiesce, but silently resent that it throws their entire morning routine off. ...

There’s a plethora of options available for people interested in seeing a mental health professional. But with so many choices of providers – each with different degrees, licenses, backgrounds, and approaches – you may feel overwhelmed when trying to figure out the best option for you. Let’s take a look at some of the most important things to consider when choosing a provider. First, it’s important to understand the types of mental health professionals out there. ...

Today, I would like to summarize the key points from a wonderful article I read in the NYT entitled “What Shamu Taught Me About a Happy Marriage” by Amy Sutherland. The piece is about what Sutherland learned about training techniques by observing professional exotic animal trainers – and how she then applied those techniques to her husband. It is one of the most-emailed NYT articles ever, and eventually led to a book which was published in February 2008. ...

There are certain well-documented patterns that can play out between partners in a long-term relationships. The pursuer-distancer dynamic is a particularly toxic one – in a longitudinal study of 1,400 divorced individuals over 30 years, psychology professor E. Mavis Hetherington found that couples who adopted this pattern were at the highest risk for divorce. The pattern is a psychological dance, oftentimes unconscious, between two partners in a relationship — one partner (the pursuer) who pursues the other (the distancer) in an effort to form closeness. If unresolved, this pattern can escalate into a Bad Idea Dominos sequence of increasingly desperate attempts to re-connect. I believe understanding the pursuer-distancer dynamic is not just helpful to understanding human relationships, but also that it can serve as a kind of early-detection system of relational distress. ...

During the course of a day, partners make requests for connection, what psychologist and mathematician John Gottman of the Gottman Institute calls bids. A bid is any attempt from one partner to another for attention, affirmation, affection, or any other positive connection. They can come in all forms – verbal, non-verbal, physical, sexual, intellectual, humorous, serious, in the form of a question or statement or comment. Non-verbal bids can include affectionate touching (a squeeze), facial expressions (sticking out your tongue), playful touching (tickling), affiliating gestures (opening a door), and vocalizing (giggling). ...

The scientist — research-driven (primary or meta-analyses), with publications in peer-reviewed journals e.g. Gottman academic papers, Eli Finkel, Joanne Davila. They invariably venture into pop texts which build (and at times hyperbolize) on results from their scientific studies. The specialist — sample-driven, with training in a relevant field layered with insights from professional experience working with different couples, e.g. Esther Perel, Stan Tatkin. Be mindful of selection bias in the context of general conclusions, since their samples are skewed (only a certain type of couple can afford to go to a world-renowned psychiatrist). ...

In my time as a digital nomad staying at co-living spaces around the world, there was one that stood out in terms of its ability to create a strong sense of community, even in an inherently diverse and transient demographic: Sun and Co. in Javea, Spain. One of the lynchpins of the Sun and Co. community building process was the weekly family meeting. Every Monday evening, the community organizers would lead an hour-long roundtable with all the residents where they introduce new people in the house, figure out the weekly agenda for the community, and share anything that’s emergent for those staying there that week. It’s a time to reflect, share, contribute, and receive. ...

During shelter-in-place, time boundaries have melted into each other. It’s difficult to differentiate between days, both as we’re going through them and when we’re looking back on them. Given that the days don’t have the structure that changing locations imposed – going into the office, heading to the gym, going out for coffee – I’ve realized that sometimesIe don’t get the individual time that I crave as an introvert. Moreover, I wasn’t sure about how to communicate that to my partner without sounding standoffish. ...

In the age of online dating, the first in-person date can be an exciting early milestone — you double opted-in on the swipe app of your choice, managed to carry on an in-app chat without forgetting about each other, and successfully navigated the scheduling gauntlet. Yet many people dial it in when it comes to planning the date, opting for a meet and greet at a neighborhood coffee shop or (even worse) the tired happy hour ritual. However, a little bit of forethought can set the stage for a rich, mutually enjoyable, and altogether more connective experience. Below are some science-backed principles to keep in mind when planning the first date. ...